|
Video Formats Compared
http://www.studio1productions.com
(Originally Published Feb. 1995, another oldie but goodie.)
(Note: This article may seem a little dated, but it never the less
contains some good information).
Remember the good old days of
trying to pick between VHS and Betamax as your video format choice.
Thanks to effective marketing techniques on JVC’s part, VHS won the
race.
However, now that video quality has become a concern among both
hobbyists and professionals alike, and there is such a fine line between
consumer and broadcast formats, we are now faced with making a decision
between as many as ten different styles of video tapes. And selecting
the on that is right for you may be a difficult choice.
In addition to regular VHS and 8mm, one can opt to go with their
respective high resolution counterparts: Super-VHS (S-VHS) and Hi-Band
(Hi-8). Also available is VHS Compact and S-VHS Compact (the smaller 20
& 30 minute cassettes that play back in a full size VCR via an adapter).
And then there is the old industrial workhorse, 3/4” U-matic and its
higher resolution brother, 3/4” SP.
The popular broadcast format, Betacam SP, has been brought down within
the financial reach of industrial and event videographers with their new
UVW series of VCRs and camcorder. And Panasonic’s version of a broadcast
component format is called MII.
Add to these the expensive digital formats like D1, D2, D3 and D5 (there
is no “D4” because the number four is an unlucky Japanese numerical
value), and you have at least fourteen separate video formats from which
to select.
(Today add DV, DVCAM, DVCPRO, Digital-S and DVCPRO-50 to the list of
choices).
You can probably rule out the Dx (D1, D2, D3 and D5) formats right off
the bat, unless you have about $80,000 to spend on each VCR. (Blank tape
for these formats can be very expensive.)
Unless you are producing high-end industrial / corporate videos, you
really don’t need to get into Betacam or MII right now. 3/4” is quickly
being replaced, however, some excellent values can be found in used 3/4”
equipment.
That leaves us with a choice of either one of the VHS or one of the 8mm
formats. Regular VHS and 8mm are still great formats if you have no
intention of going on to a second or third generation. In other words,
you’re satisfied with what you shot right out of the camera and you have
no intentions of editing.
But since you’re reading this publication, chances are editing is a
major part of your video lifestyle. And that’s where S-VHS and Hi-8
become the attractive choices. Both S-VHS and Hi-8 provide a horizontal
resolution of about 400 lines or better and their respective signal to
noise ratios are very comparable.
And, both S-VHS and Hi-8 are downwardly compatible with their non-high
resolution formats (you can play and record, let’s say, regular VHS
tapes in a S-VHS VCR, but not vise-versa).
Many videographers swear that the video they shoot with Hi-8 is superior
to what they have seen with S-VHS. The reason this is generally true is
not because of the actual video format, but rather the camera that
they’re shooting it in.
For reasons unknown, Sony and Cannon (the two major manufacturers of
Hi-8 cameras) have put more effort into the quality of their lenses and
CCD pickup elements (the little chip behind the lens that converts light
into electrical pulses).
These quality optical systems is what gives the improved picture that
one might see off of a Hi-8 camera. Panasonic and JVC (the S-VHS guys)
make excellent consumer and “prosumer” camcorders, but their optics just
don’t stand up to those on Hi-8 cameras. And the popularity of the
smaller, lighter Hi-8’s have moved them to the top of the sales
statistics for consumer-grade camcorders. (Industrial and professional
cameras are another story altogether.)
Mix and Match
So, why has S-VHS become the virtual industry standard for high-end
editing. Primarily because it is a more durable video format. It is less
prone to tape stretching and video drop-outs. The comparable editing
VCRs cost less than Hi-8 editing VCRs. And the S-VHS format permits
audio and video inserting without limitations and the blank tape cost is
less expensive than Hi-8.
“Well, should I have a Hi-8 system or a S-VHS system?’
Why not have the best of both worlds? The video signal that goes in and
out of camcorders and VCRs is a universal language. The output of a Hi-8
VCR (or camera) connects perfectly into the video input of a S-VHS VCR
(or vise versa). And both format can interchangeably travel in and out
of any digital video mixer or other signal processing device.
The ideal video system for the low-to-mid level professional
videographer would be a quality camcorder (AG-455/456, TR-101, TR-700,
VX-3, Cannon L1/L2) as the acquisition tool. And an industrial-level
S-VHS VCR (Panasonic AG-1970/1980, JVC S-365) as the editing VCR.
To take the strain off of your Hi-8 camcorder as being the source
VCR(s), you can pick up one or two Sony EV-C100 Hi-8 VCRs used for a
great price.
The Right Connections
To achieve the most out of your hybrid Hi-8 / S-VHS system, make sure
that you use the S-Video (Y/C) connectors throughout your entire signal
path. And be sure to use quality S-Video cables to make those
connections. Also, be sure not to skimp on the quality of your video
tape.
Broadcast Quality
The term “broadcast quality” is thrown around frequently, especially in
advertising the performance of a particular piece of video gear.
Anymore, there really isn’t a standard for true broadcast quality, which
is demonstrated by the fact that TV shows like “America Funniest Home
Videos” broadcast some of the poorest quality footage ever produced.
The ironic part is that Hi-8 and S-VHS put out better quality today than
the television networks did five years ago. So, given all of that, you
may want to think about either S-VHS, Hi-8, or a combination of both (or
DV) when building your editing system.
|