|
Number 6 - Video Card Memory
The Mercury Playback Engine requires the NVIDIA video card to have at least 896 megs memory or more.
Anything less, the Mercury Playback Engine will NOT work in the GPU accelerated mode.
It will work in the Software mode, but you want it to work in the GPU accelerated mode. I personally recommend at least 1 gig or higher of DDR5 video memory.
Video cards come with different types of memory, such as DDR2, DDR3, and DDR5 type of memory. If you are going to be purchasing a video card,
buy one with DDR5
memory. It offers 50% more bandwidth than DDR3 memory and it makes a performance difference with Adobe Premiere CS5 and the Mercury Playback Engine.
If you already have a video card with DDR3 memory and you don't want to buy a new card with DDR5 memory, it will work, but it won't be as fast as most
video cards with DDR5 memory. Just remember, your video card will need 896 megs or more of video ram.
DO NOT buy a video card with DDR2 memory. The DDR2 memory can cause performance problems with the Mercury Playback Engine. If you
have a video card with DDR2 memory, replace it.
To give you an example of the performance difference between DDR3 and DDR5 memory, we ran some tests using a MSI NVidia GT240 video card with 1 gig of DDR5 memory and
a MSI NVidia GT240 video card with 1 gig of DDR3. The video card with the DDR5 memory gave us around a 45% speed increase over a GT240 with DDR3 memory.
Bottom line, if you are going to be buying a video card, it is best to buy a video card with 1 gig or more of DDR5 memory.
Number 7 - Chart of NVidia graphics Cards
As we said earlier, each NVIDIA GPU has a certain number of CUDA cores, which is the computing engine in the NVIDIA GPU. Below is a list of NVIDIA video cards and the number of CUDA cores that each
video card offers. (Note: the more CUDA cores the larger the power supply will have to be, we will cover that next)
| NVIDIA Card |
Number
of CUDA
Cores |
Size of Power Supply ** |
Memory Type |
Memory
Interface
Width |
Graphic Clock
Speed |
Processor Clock
Speed |
NOTES |
| 9400 GT |
16 |
300 watt |
DDR2 or DDR3 |
128 Bit |
550 Mhz |
1400 Mhz |
Not Recommend |
| 9500 GT |
32 |
350 watt |
DDR2 or DDR3 |
128 Bit |
550 Mhz |
1400 Mhz |
Not Recommend |
| 9600 GT |
64 |
400 watt |
DDR3 |
256 Bit |
600 Mhz |
1500 Mhz |
Not Recommend - Only has 512 Megs |
| 9800 GT |
112 |
400 watt |
DDR3 |
256 Bit |
600 Mhz |
1500 Mhz |
|
| 9800 GTX |
128 |
450 watt |
DDR3 |
256 Bit |
|
1688 Mhz |
|
| 9800 GX2 |
256 |
580 watt |
DDR3 |
512 Bit |
600 Mhz |
1500 Mhz |
(128 per GPU) Premiere CS5 at this time only supports 1 GPU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GeForce G100 |
8 |
300 watt |
DDR2 |
64 Bit |
567 Mhz |
1400 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GT 120 |
32 |
350 watt |
DDR2 |
128 Bit |
500 Mhz |
1400 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GT 130 |
48 |
350 watt |
DDR2 |
192 Bit |
500 Mhz |
1250 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GTS 150 |
128 |
450 watt |
DDR3 |
256 Bit |
738 Mhz |
1836 Mhz |
OEM Video Card |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GeForce 205 |
8 |
300 watt |
DDR2 |
64 Bit |
589 Mhz |
1402 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GeForce 210 |
16 |
300 watt |
DDR2 |
64 Bit |
589 Mhz |
1402 Mhz |
Not Recommended |
| GT 220 |
48 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
625 Mhz |
1360 Mhz |
Okay on low speed dual core processors, for about $20 more you can get the GT240 |
| GT 240 |
96 |
300 watt |
DDR3 or DDR5 |
128 Bit |
550 Mhz |
1340 Mhz |
I Recommend the DDR5 memory version of this card |
| GTS 240 OEM |
112 |
450 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
675 Mhz |
1620 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended Only has DDR3 memory |
| GTS 250 |
128 |
450 watt |
DDR3 |
256 Bit |
738 Mhz |
1836 Mhz |
|
| GTX 260 |
192 |
500 watt |
DDR3 |
448 Bit |
576 Mhz |
1242 Mhz |
|
| GTX 275 |
240 |
550 watt |
DDR3 |
448 Bit |
633 Mhz |
1404 Mhz |
|
| GTX 280 |
240 |
550 watt |
DDR3 |
512 Bit |
602 Mhz |
1296 Mhz |
|
| GTX 285 |
240 |
550 watt |
DDR3 |
512 Bit |
648 Mhz |
1476 Mhz |
End of Life Product |
| GTX 295 |
480 |
680 watt |
DDR3 |
896 Bit |
576 Mhz |
1242 Mhz |
(240 per GPU) Premiere CS5 at this time only supports 1 GPU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GeForce 310 |
16 |
300 watt |
DDR2 |
64 Bit |
589 Mhz |
1402 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GeForce 315 |
48 |
300 watt |
DDR2 |
64 Bit |
475 Mhz |
1100 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended only has 512 Megs memory |
| GT 320 |
72 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
540 Mhz |
1302 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GT 330 |
96 to 112 |
300 watt |
DDR2 or DDR3 |
|
|
|
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GT 340 |
96 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
550 Mhz |
1340 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GeForce 405 |
16 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
64 bit |
580 Mhz |
1402 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GT 420 OEM |
48 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
700 Mhz |
1400 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Not Recommended |
| GT 430 |
96 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
700 Mhz |
1400 Mhz |
Only available with DDR3 memory at this time. You are better off with the GT240 card with DDR5 memory. |
| GT 430 OEM |
96 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
700 Mhz |
1400 Mhz |
Only available with DDR3 memory at this time. You are better off with the GT240 card with DDR5 memory. |
| GT 440 |
96 |
300 watt |
DDR3 or DDR5 |
128 Bit |
810 Mhz |
1620 Mhz |
Make sure you get the DDR5 with 1 Gig of memory version. |
| GT 440 OEM |
144 |
400 watt |
DDR3 or DDR5 |
192 Bit |
594 Mhz |
1189 Mhz |
OEM Video Card - Has DDR3 or DDR5 memory. |
| GTS 450 |
192 |
400 watt |
DDR5 |
128 Bit |
783 Mhz |
1566 Mhz |
|
| GTS 450 OEM |
144 |
400 watt |
DDR5 |
192 Bit |
790 Mhz |
1580 Mhz |
|
| GTX 460 |
336 |
450 watt |
DDR5 |
256 Bit |
675 Mhz |
1350 Mhz |
Specs are for 1GB DDR5 version of this card. |
| GTX 460 SE |
228 |
450 watt |
DDR5 |
256 Bit |
650 Mhz |
1300 Mhz |
|
| GTX 465 |
352 |
550 watt |
DDR5 |
256 Bit |
607 Mhz |
1215 Mhz |
|
| GTX 470 |
448 |
550 watt |
DDR5 |
320 Bit |
607 Mhz |
1215 Mhz |
|
| GTX 480 |
480 |
600 watt |
DDR5 |
384 Bit |
700 Mhz |
1401 Mhz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GT 520 |
48 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
64 Bit |
810 Mhz |
1620 Mhz |
|
| GT 530 |
96 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
700 Mhz |
1400 Mhz |
OEM Card |
| GT 545 DDR3 |
144 |
350 watt |
DDR3 |
192 Bit |
720 Mhz |
1440 Mhz |
|
| GT 545 GDDR5 |
144 |
400 watt |
DDR5 |
128 Bit |
870 Mhz |
1740 Mhz |
|
| GTX 550 Ti |
192 |
400 watt |
DDR5 |
192 Bit |
900 Mhz |
1800 Mhz |
|
| GTX 555 OEM |
288 |
450 watt |
DDR5 |
192 Bit |
776 Mhz |
1553 Mhz |
OEM Card |
| GTX 560 OEM |
384 |
450 watt |
DDR5 |
320 Bit |
552 Mhz |
1104 Mhz |
OEM Card |
| GTX 560 |
336 |
450 watt |
DDR5 |
256 Bit |
810-950 Mhz |
1620-1900 Mhz |
|
| GTX 560 Ti |
384 |
500 watt |
DDR5 |
256 Bit |
822 Mhz |
1645 Mhz |
|
| GTX 560 TI OEM |
352 |
500 watt |
DDR5 |
320 Bit |
732 Mhz |
1464 Mhz |
OEM Card |
| GTX 570 |
480 |
550 watt |
DDR5 |
320 Bit |
732 Mhz |
1464 Mhz |
|
| GTX 580 |
512 |
600 watt |
DDR5 |
384 Bit |
772 Mhz |
1544 Mhz |
|
| GTX 590 |
1024 |
700 watt |
DDR5 |
384 Bit Per GPU |
607 Mhz |
1215 Mhz |
Dual GPU - Premiere CS5 at this time only supports 1 GPU. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quadro FX 370 LP |
8 |
350 watt |
DDR2 |
64 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 256 Megs |
| Quadro FX 370 |
16 |
450 watt |
DDR2 |
64 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 256 Megs |
| Quadro FX 380 LP |
16 |
350 watt |
DDR3 |
64 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 256 Megs |
| Quadro FX 380 |
16 |
450 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 256 Megs |
| Quadro FX 570 |
16 |
450 watt |
DDR2 |
128 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 512 Megs |
| Quadro FX 580 |
32 |
50 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 512 Megs |
| Quadro FX 1700 |
32 |
450 watt |
DDR2 |
128 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 512 Megs |
| Quadro FX 1800 |
64 |
450 watt |
DDR3 |
192 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 768 Megs |
| Quadro FX 3700 |
112 |
450 watt |
DDR3 |
256 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 512 Megs |
| Quadro FX 3800 |
192 |
550 watt |
DDR3 |
256 Bit |
|
|
Has 1 Gig Memory |
| Quadro FX 4600 |
112 |
750 watt |
DDR3 |
384 Bit |
|
|
Not Recommended - Only has 768 Megs |
| Quadro FX 4800 |
192 |
750 watt |
DDR3 |
384 Bit |
|
|
Has 1.5 Gigs Memory |
| Quadro FX 5600 |
128 |
750 watt |
DDR3 |
384 Bit |
|
|
Has 1.5 Gigs Memory |
| Quadro FX 5800 |
240 |
750 watt |
DDR3 |
512 Bit |
|
|
Has 4 Gigs Memory |
| Quadro CX |
192 |
750 watt |
DDR3 |
384 Bit |
|
|
Has 1.5 Gigs Memory |
| Quadro 600 |
96 |
300 watt |
DDR3 |
128 Bit |
|
|
Only available with DDR3 memory at this time. You are better off with the GT240 card with DDR5 memory |
| Quadro 2000 |
192 |
500 watt |
DDR5 |
128 Bit |
|
|
Has 1 Gig of DDR5 Memory - Can vary by manufacturer |
| Quadro 2000D |
192 |
500 watt |
DDR5 |
128 Bit |
|
|
Has 1 Gig of DDR5 Memory - Can vary by manufacturer |
| Quadro 4000 |
256 |
500 watt |
DDR5 |
256 Bit |
|
|
Has 2 Gigs of DDR5 Memory - Can vary by manufacturer |
| Quadro 5000 |
352 |
550 watt |
DDR5 |
320 Bit |
|
|
Has 2.5 Gigs of DDR5 Memory - Can vary by manufacturer |
| Quadro 6000 |
448 |
750 watt |
DDR5 |
384 Bit |
|
|
Has 6 Gigs of DDR5 Memory - Can vary by manufacturer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**NOTE: The
specs and power supply requirements listed above are based on NVidia's web site. PLEASE check with the
manufacturer of the video card you plan on purchasing to see what their power supply requirements are.
NOTE: Adobe Premiere CS5 and Premiere CS5.5 does not support more than 1 GPU.
So the GTX590, which has dual GPU's, only 1 GPU and half of the CUDA cores
will be used by Premiere CS5 and Premiere CS5.5. If you are looking at the
GTX590, you would be better off with the GTX580.
Number 8 - Power Supplies
The Power Supply -
Before you run out and buy an NVIDIA video card, you need to know how big your power supply is in watts. Different video cards will require that you have a minimum number of watts power
supply. So open your computer, if you are comfortable doing that, otherwise, find someone who is.
Look on the label on the power supply for the number of watts it is rated. It may say something like 300 watts, 450 watts or higher.
Once you know the watts, then you can select a video card that will work with your power supply.
For example, the NVIDIA GeForce GT440 will work fine with a 300 watt power supply. But, the GeForce GT580 will require a minimum of a
600 watt power supply.
This is why you need to know your computer’s power supply size before you run out and buy a video card. You don’t want to use a video card that your power supply can’t handle.
For example, if you decide you really want a GeForce GT580 video card and you only have a 300 watt power supply, then you will need to upgrade your computer’s power supply.
A lot of the computers you buy in a retail store (not custom built computers) will have a 300
or 450 watt power supply. So if you don’t want to bother upgrading your power supply, then make sure you
stick with a video card that will work with what every the size of your power
supply is.
In the chart above, we list a minimum power supply size needed for the each video card. This list above are based on NVidia's web site recommendations.
We had some one email us about the MSI N240GT (GT 240) video card with 1 GB of DDR5 memory and that the MSI box says it requires a
350 watt power supply. So why does our chart list a 300 watt power supply?
Okay, if you look at the MSI box for the GT240 with DDR5 memory, it does say they recommend a minimum of 350 watt power supply. But, when you open up
the installation guide it says the minimum power supply is 500 watts based on a PC configured with an Intel Core2Extreme Qx9650 processor. Wait a
minute, the list above says 300 watts. Okay so what is going on here?
According to MSI, the main group of people who buy higher performance video cards are people who use the computer to play games. The GT 240 card falls into
this category and the GT 240 card with 1GB of DDR5 memory is capable of being overclocked. (See
Note 2 on Overclocking). MSI recommends a 350 watts if you are a gamer
and are going to overclock the video card. If you won't be overclocking the card and you really don't need to for video editing, MSI said you will be
fine with a 300 watt power supply.
If you are running a quad core system, such as one with the Core2Extreme Qx9650 processor, you will generally have a larger power supply than 300 watts any way and most
likely it will be 450 to 500 watts or larger. This is why their installation guide recommends a 500 watt power supply. The more powerful
the CPU, the larger power supply your computer will have, since the CPU pulls quite a bit of power in watts. For example, the quad core Qx9650 processor
pulls around 65 watts and the I7-930 processor pulls 130 watts.
Also, I was informed by several other video card manufacturers that they put a higher minimum power supply requirement on their video cards, since they don't
know what other devices or the number of hard drives you have in your computer. This way, they will be on the safe side.
Currently, two of our computes are HP a1630n stock systems, with AMD Athlon 64 5200+ processors. These systems have stock 300 watt power supplies.
Each system has two hard drives, 6 gig of ram, a MSI GT 240 1GB DDR5 memory video card and each system has a AzenX Blitztorm cooler. And, they run
just fine with the GT 240 card with a 300 watt power supply. Yes, we are running Premiere CS5 on these systems.
While they are no where as fast as our quad core systems, they will run Premiere. For more information about these
two computers, see the FAQ section at the end of this article.
Number 9 - Video Card Performance and System Performance.
PLEASE READ THIS SECTION CAREFULLY.
Our First test system (AMD Quad Core):
We used an HP computer running an AMD Phenom II X4 (quad core) computer running at 3.2 Ghz with 8 gigs of RAM and a single Samsung 7200 rpm SATA 3.0Gb/s hard drive.
The computer was running Window 7 Home edition. All of the video cards
had 1 Gig DDR5 memory.
All tests were run with the MRQ (Maximum Render Quality) set to ON. To measure the time, I used a stopwatch.
Each test was run 5 times in the GPU mode and then averaged together.
Tests with the Mercury Playback Engine in Software mode was run once.
MPE GPU = I was running the Mercury Playback Engine using GPU Acceleration.
MPE Software = I ran the test with the Mercury Playback Engine using Software only.
First Benchmark Test - I used Adobe Premiere CS5.5 and the
PPBM5 benchmark project that uses 4 video tracks.
The chart below shows the time it took to render the timeline with multiple effects and dissolves.
| Video Card |
# of Cuda Cores |
Time Line Render
MPE GPU On |
Time Line Render
MPE Software |
MPE GPU On
Export to
MPEG-2 DVD |
MPE Software Mode
Export to
MPEG-2 DVD |
| GT-240 |
96 |
34.2 Seconds |
373 Seconds |
281 Seconds |
387 Seconds |
| GT-440 |
96 |
33.3 Seconds |
373 Seconds |
275 Seconds |
387 Seconds |
| GTX-470 |
448 |
31.6 Seconds |
373 Seconds |
230 Seconds |
387 Seconds |
| GTX-545 |
144 |
32.8 Seconds |
373 Seconds |
258 Seconds |
387 Seconds |
| GTX-550 Ti |
192 |
31.9 Seconds |
373 Seconds |
246 Seconds |
387 Seconds |
| GTX-570 |
480 |
31.5 Seconds |
373 Seconds |
193 Seconds |
387 Seconds |
Note: the MPEG-2 DVD test above was run by using direct
export, by selecting File, then Export and then Media. I used the
following settings during the Export. Format = MPEG2-DVD, Preset =
NTSC High Quality Widescreen, I then unchecked Export Audio and I unchecked Use
Max Render Quality, Use Previews and Use Frame Blending.
Our Second test system
(I7-920):
We used a computer running an Intel I7-920 (quad core) computer running at 3.05 Ghz with
16 gigs of RAM and a dual Seagate 7200 rpm SATA 3.0Gb/s hard drive.
The computer was running Window 7 Home edition. All of the video cards
had 1 Gig DDR5 memory.
I used the same Adobe Premiere CS5.5 and the same
PPBM5 benchmark project that uses 4 video tracks,
as I did above.
All tests were run with the MRQ (Maximum Render Quality) set to ON. To measure the time, I used a stopwatch.
Each test was run 3 times in the GPU mode and then averaged
together. Tests with the Mercury Playback Engine in
Software mode was run once.
| Video Card |
# of Cuda Cores |
Time Line Render
MPE GPU On |
Time Line Render
MPE Software |
MPE GPU On
Export to
MPEG-2 DVD |
MPE Software Mode
Export to
MPEG-2 DVD |
| GT-240 |
96 |
11.5 Seconds |
114 Seconds |
181 Seconds |
176 Seconds |
| GT-440 |
96 |
11.5 Seconds |
114 Seconds |
180 Seconds |
176 Seconds |
| GTX-470 |
448 |
10 Seconds |
114 Seconds |
98.5 Seconds |
176 Seconds |
| GTX-545 |
144 |
11 Seconds |
114 Seconds |
168 Seconds |
176 Seconds |
| GTX-550 Ti |
192 |
11 Seconds |
114 Seconds |
159 Seconds |
176 Seconds |
| GTX-570 |
480 |
10 Seconds |
114 Seconds |
97 Seconds |
176 Seconds |
Note: the MPEG-2 DVD test above was run by using direct
export, by selecting File, then Export and then Media. I used the
following settings during the Export. Format = MPEG2-DVD, Preset =
NTSC High Quality Widescreen, I then unchecked Export Audio and I unchecked Use
Max Render Quality, Use Previews and Use Frame Blending.
Explaining the Test Results - The Rendering Results
(Please read this section very carefully)
In case you are wondering, Adobe Premiere
uses ALL of the CUDA cores on the video card.
Let's take a look at the results. As you can see
even though both computers are quad core systems and the clock speed is
close, the Intel processor performed much better. The reason, AMD
processors do not have SSE 4.1+ support, where the Intel processors do.
Premiere Pro uses the SSE 4.1+ instruction set, thus providing better
performance. Now this doesn't mean you can't use an AMD processor,
you can, it will perform slower than the Intel processors.
Timeline Rendering. As you can see when you
render the timeline with the Mercury Playback Engine (MPE) in the GPU
acceleration mode vs. the MPE in software mode, there is a huge
difference in speed on both the AMD and Intel systems.
Another thing you will notice is there is NOT a big
difference between a NVidia card with 96 cuda cores vs. one with 480
cuda cores, when rendering the
timeline.
Exporting to MPEG2-DVD format. Here is where
things get interesting. You will notice on both systems, that the
more cuda cores the faster it is to export to the MPEG2-DVD format with
the Mercury Playback Engine (MPE) in the GPU acceleration mode vs. the
MPE in software mode.
On the AMD system, even having just 96 cuda cores, the
MPE GPU mode is faster than the MPE is in software mode.
However, on the Intel I7-920 system, a video card with
96 cuda cores, can be a few seconds slower than if you used the MPE in
software mode. The reason for this is, on this Intel system, the CPU
could actually export the MPEG2-DVD footage faster than the video card
with 96 cuda cores. Once I put in a
GTX-545 with 144 cuda cores, then the video card was able to export faster than the
software mode. As I installed different video cards with more and more cuda
cores on them, the faster exporting became.
Exporting to h.264 format. Although I don't show
the results above in the charts, exporting to the h.264 format with MPE
in the GPU mode, was any were from 38% to 50% faster then exporting in
the MPE software mode. The difference between a 96 cuda core video
card and a 480 cuda core video card was 7 seconds when exporting in the
MPE GPU mode.
Newer Intel CPU's - If you have a newer Intel CPU, such
as the I7-2600 processor, you will benefit by having 300 or cuda cores
on the video card when exporting to the MPEG2-DVD format. If you
don't export to the MPEG2-DVD format, then you can get by with an NVidia
card with less cuda cores.
Bottom Line:
If you have a computer with an AMD processor, you will
be fine with a NVidia video card with 96 or more cuda cores.
If you have an older Intel CPU (dual core or quad core), you too will be
fine with a NVidia video card with 96 or more cuda cores.
If you have a newer Intel CPU such as the I7-2600, you
should get an NVidia card with 300 cuda cores or more if you are going
to be exporting to MPEG-2 DVD format.
However,
If you have a newer Intel CPU such as the I7-2600 and
you will NOT be exporting to the MPEG-2 DVD format (or you are rarely
going to be exporting to the MPEG-2 DVD format) then you will be fine
with 96 cuda cores or more.
NOTE: I
realize that not everyone has the need to export to the MPEG-2 DVD
format. Some video editor are producing content for the web or
h.264 for Blu-Ray or the are exporting to some other format. I
understand this.
Unfortunately, there are people on the web that like to just make a
blanket statement, such as "you need to have 384 cuda cores to get good
performance with Premiere" or "you need a GTX-xxx card".
They don't stop to think about the type of CPU you have or
what you export your final product to or what your
power supply is. Remember, you may have to upgrade your power
supply if the video card you select won't work with you current power
supply. And they don't take into consideration if you are a
hobbyist, student, amateur, part-time editor or pro editor. Plus,
they don't take into account of your budget.
While they are trying to be helpful, they are not asking you enough
questions to give you a good answer, just a blanket statement.
Another thing that has been brought to my attention is, on some of the
forums, people are being told their system won't cut it. However, they
are reporting to me, that once they have either put in a NVidia video
card and unlocking it or unlocked their existing card, they feel they
are getting great performance. So they asked me why are they being
told their system won't cut it?
What is happening here is everyone has a different level
acceptable of performance. Some people just need the
fastest (and expensive) system in order to be comfortable editing.
They have a high level of acceptable performance.
While other people are just as comfortable editing on a slower and less
expensive system. They have a lower level of acceptable
performance and there is nothing wrong with that.
I have had a few comments thrown my way because my computers all
have AMD processors. I have had to explain more than once, that my
main use for the computer's are for rendering animations. My
animation software doesn't care if it is on a AMD or Intel. The
speed they render at is practically the same for either processor. For my needs with Premiere CS5.5, my AMD systems
and the GT-240 card
works out great for me, because I do NOT render out to MPEG2-DVD format.
In addition,
I could use the power supply that came in the computer and the GT240 was
very inexpensive when I bought them. I have no problems editing on
my quad core AMD system.
To be fair, not everyone on the forums are like this. But, there
are those few who are and they can be very vocal about their opinions on
what you should have..
I realize that people's budgets are tight. That's why I show the
speed differences across a variety of video cards. So you can get
an idea of how different video cards perform in different systems.
We Ran Second Benchmark Test:
We used an HP computer running an AMD Phenom II X4 (quad core) computer running at 3.2 Ghz with 8 gigs of RAM and a single Samsung 7200 rpm SATA 3.0Gb/s hard drive.
The computer was running Window 7 Home edition. All of the video cards
had 1 Gig DDR5 memory.
Second Benchmark Test (Updated 07/10/11) - I used
Adobe Premiere CS5.5 and a 10 minute time line with 3 tracks and multiple effects and dissolves.
Each video card had at least 1 Gig of DDR5 memory.
| Video Card |
# of Cuda Cores |
Time Line Rendering
MPE GPU Hardware
Minutes & Seconds |
Time Line Rendering
MPE Software
Minutes & Seconds |
| GT-240 |
96 |
5:41 |
40:12 |
| GT-440 |
96 |
5:37 |
40:12 |
| GTX-470 |
448 |
5:34 |
40:12 |
| GTX-545 |
144 |
5:37 |
40:12 |
| GTX-550 Ti |
192 |
5:35 |
40:12 |
| GTX-570 |
480 |
5:29 |
40:12 |
A word about the Second Benchmark Test: The second benchmark tests were run
only rendering the timeline. This
was done so I could show you the difference in using the Premiere in GPU mode
vs. software mode using various video cards with a longer timeline.
Your results will vary from mine simply because our systems
are different. From the chipset on the motherboard, to the memory chips, brand of video card, etc. all of these things will make a difference in the
benchmarks. If you run your own tests, make sure you run your tests with the Maximum Render Quality set to ON
for both Software mode and GPU mode.
I have received numerous emails from people who said, when the upgrade from one video card to another, they didn't get any performance
boost when rendering the timeline. And we didn't see that much either with our test system and the benchmarks
above. However, I have had a couple of emails stating they did see a small increase in timeline rendering speed. The reason why some people don't see
any difference and other do see a slight difference can be attributed to how their computer system is configured.
Here are some factors that will come into play for overall system performance, they are:
CPU Cores and Clock Speed - The more CPU cores you have and the higher the clock speed the better. Remember, the decoding of your video is handled by the CPU.
AMD processors do not have SSE 4.1+ support, where the Intel processors do. This will help when decoding heavily compressed video formats such as AVCHD and
h.264. This isn't to say the AMD processors won't work, they will. They will decode a little slower.
Hard Disk - The faster the hard drive the better. A rotation speed of 7,200 RPM's is a minimum you want.
A rotation speed of 10,000 RPM is better. Raid drive systems will improve performance. The amount of cache the hard drive has can make a difference. The more cache the better.
RAM Memory - The ram speed and latency will play a part in the overall performance. Plus, the more memory you have in your computer the
better the overall performance will be. Going from 4 gigs to 8 gigs, we saw about 25% speed improvement when encoding to a MPEG2 DVD. When we upgrade from 8
to 12 gigs, we saw another 25 to 30% speed improvement when encoding to a MPEG2 DVD. Others have reported even higher speed improvements on their systems.
GPU and CUDA cores - The more CUDA cores, the wider the bandwidth and having DDR5 memory on the video card, the better performance the
video card has to offer. Remember, just because the video card has more to offer, doesn't mean the rest of the computer system will take advantage of it as
it has to wait on the rest of the computer systems.
The Video Formant - Different video formats put different demands on the CPU and GPU. For example, if you have an AVI clip on your
timeline and you export it to an AVI file with no effects or transitions then the GPU will get around 1% usage. However, if your timeline has the same
AVI clip with no effects or transitions and you are exporting to an MPEG2 DVD then GPU will see much more usage.
Please understand, do to all of the various computer configurations (ie. amount of RAM, BUS speeds, hard drive speeds, type of video card, the type of RAM on the video
card, the CPU type, the speed of the CPU, etc. ) your performance results will naturally vary from others. This is not due to Premiere, but do to the way
your computer is configured and to the video format you are working with.
Some people have
reported they have only seen a small increase in performance, while others say they have seen up to 12 time faster performance.
This is because of the video format, the effects and transitions they are using. Each can play a big part in how much speed increase you will see. If you use a simple video format
with no effects or transitions, don't expect to see a huge increase in performance.
In our computer systems, having a video card with 96 CUDA cores and DDR5 memory was more than sufficient and gave us very close performance as higher end
video cards with more CUDA cores and a wider memory bandwidth.
As a side note:
If you have a video card already NVidia graphics card, check the chart above to see how many CUDA cores you have. If you
have 48 or more CUDA cores you should see a performance improvement with Adobe Premiere CS5. While the performance will not be as much as a video card
with 96 CUDA cores or more, you will still see a performance improvement over running Adobe Premiere CS in the Software Only mode and with the Maximum Render Quality set to On.
I also did test a 9400GT video card that had 1 gig of memory and with 16 CUDA cores. The footage and tests we ran didn't show any real improvement
over using the Mercury Playback Engine in software mode. However, I did hear from a few people who said they did see a small improvement even with 16 CUDA cores. So
if you have a video card with a low number of CUDA cores, you will have to do some testing to see if you do get any improvement.
Bottom Line: Will you see a performance increase? Yes. How much will the varies with the factors listed above. Now the performance increase I am talking about
is between having the Mercury Playback Engine in Software mode vs. GPU Acceleration mode and having the Maximum Render Quality set to
ON when comparing between the Software mode and GPU Acceleration mode.
Note: these test results are from our systems, your results will vary from ours, simply because of the hardware differences.
Number 10 - What Video Card to Buy
This is
the big question for a lot of people. Some of you may think, “I will go with the GTX580 since it has a lot of CUDA
cores and I have a big enough power supply“. You want the most powerful video card, right?
Well hold on a minute. Think about this first.... Some people have to have the biggest, best and fastest computer system without regard to cost.
On the other hand, a lot of people just want a video card that will give them great performance without spending a lot of money.
Here are two examples of video card prices. You can get a GT440 video card with 1 gig of DDR5 memory for around $70, depending on the brand.
You can also get a GTX580 video card with 1.5 gigs of DDR5 memory for around $470 to $525, again depending on the brand. (Prices are from 01/29/12)
That's about a $400 difference in price. Now look at the benchmarks above and think about it. Remember, depending on the video card you choose, you
may need to upgrade your power supply. So that may be an added expense.
I really can't say what you should buy, but if your on a budget,
as a lot of people are today,
take a look at the GT440, GT530 or the GT545 with DDR5 memory.
Note: the GT440 and GT530 will work with a 300 power supply, where the
GT545 will need a 400 watt power supply.
Now, if you are not on a budge, the GTX 550 or higher will be a great choice.
Just remember you may have to upgrade your power supply.
Just remember, the video card should have 1 gig or more of DDR5 memory.
Currently, I am using the GT240's and a GT440 video cards. Even with an AMD X6 (6 core) system, we are using the GT440 video card.
The reason why I am using these video cards is simple, several of our systems only have 300 watt power supplies, so I didn't have to spent money to upgrade
the power supplies. Plus, they were not expensive and based upon our tests they gave us great performance without having to spend a lot on a video card.
Most of our work is NOT being rendered to MPEG-2 format.
NOTE: If you run games or other programs that are video card intensive, a high end video card may boost your performance in those programs.
Okay, before you run old and buy a video card, there is one more thing you need to know......


Note 1
Unlocking the NVIDIA video card will not make it "certified" in the eyes of Adobe. Adobe would like you to use a "certified" NVIDIA video card,
because these are the ones they have put through rigorous testing with Premiere CS5 and Premiere CS5.5.
With Adobe Premiere CS5
version 5.03, Adobe recommends the following video cards:
GeForce GTX 285
GTX 470
Quadro 4000
Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000M
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 5800
Quadro CX |
With Adobe Premiere CS5.5, Adobe
recommends the following video cards:
GeForce GTX 285 (Windows and Mac OS)
GeForce GTX 470 (Windows)
GeForce GTX 570 (Windows)
GeForce GTX 580 (Windows)
Quadro FX 3700M (Windows)
Quadro FX 3800 (Windows)
Quadro FX 3800M (Windows)
Quadro FX 4800 (Windows and Mac OS)
Quadro FX 5800 (Windows)
Quadro 2000 (Windows)
Quadro 2000D (Windows)
Quadro 2000M (Windows)
Quadro 3000M (Windows)
Quadro 4000 (Windows and Mac OS)
Quadro 4000M (Windows)
Quadro 5000 (Windows)
Quadro 5000M (Windows)
Quadro 5010M (Windows)
Quadro 6000 (Windows)
Quadro CX (Windows) |
There are a thousands of users out there that are using this unlock technique on their NVIDIA cards with no problems at all and that includes us, at Studio 1 Productions.
Mercury Playback Hack Premiere CS5 Premiere CS5.5
Note 2
The MSI N240GT series of graphics cards (including the N240GT-MD512-OC/D5 and N240GT-MD1G) allows the user to adjust both the voltage
and the overclocking configurations via the Afterburner overclocking software from MSI to increase GPU clock up to 30%. The core clock can go from 550Mhz to 625Mhz.
We do NOT recommending overclocking ANY video card when working with Premiere CS5.
We have experienced, along with other users reporting that when the video card was overclocked, Premiere CS5 would crash after using it a few minutes.
The crashing can be from high video card temps and/or overclocking the video card to a speed that is beyond what the video card can handle for long periods of time.

|